Breeds and sustainable systems
It is considered that
the farming system uses such breeding plans that do not damage the environment.
Those breeding plans in which highly productive animals are produced does not
maintain sustainability instead sustainability is considered in those breeding
plans that are conducted at small scale and involve recycling of waste
materials, use local food sources and local breeds and these are labor
intensive processes.
When the food sources
are not good and when the environment is harsh than local breeds are important
in order to use sustainable breeding plans. This system has a draw back that it
does not produces efficient animals when we want to produce them for meat and
milk as compared to intensive systems in which highly productive animals are
produced.
There are some reasons
why we use these local systems:
·
In an are where
there are harsh environmental conditions in such areas intensive systems fail
to work so in such areas only local breeds work. We can take the example of
cattle that is present in tropical areas. This term can be applied to small
animals like rabbits, pigs etc but not to large animals.
·
When we use
these systems than we can avoid the migration of local people to urban areas so
that urban areas cannot be stressed. In these areas life is very difficult for
humans and they deserve better life so these local breeding plans are a
temporary solution.
·
These local
systems do not damage environment and they are better for animal welfare, but
animal welfare is not considered in each case. If the egg production system is
intensive than they use such cages that are rich in food. Another advantage of
these intensive systems is that these animals produce less concentration of
carbon dioxide and produce less amounts of pollutants as compared to local
breeding plans. According to a report organic chickens are more contaminated
and more contaminants are present in their meat. The hens that are free and
search out their food themselves are not happy than those hens that are present
in those cages that are enriched with food. When we want to produce animals on
industrial scale than animal welfare is not considered a task. These systems
makes the farmers independent from multinational companies but this is not good
in developing and under developed countries. These multinational companies
provide cheap genetics as the main priority of these countries is to feed their
people. If we talk about genetics it is very cheap like price of 1 kg meat of
chicken is less than 1% of its total cost. There are very few multinational
companies that provide cheap protein sources.
·
There are some
breeds that better adopt to the environment that is local. It is not true that
just local breeds are well adopted to the local environment but not the foreign
breeds. There are some foreign breeds that better adopt to the new environment.
We can take the example of Nelore cattle that better
adopted to the Brazilian environment. Adaptation to a new environment is
problematic in some animal species. The small animals like rabbit and pigs etc
can better adopt to the new environment as compared to large animals like
cattle etc. The food sources that are obtained from highly productive animals
are of better quality as compared to those sources that are obtained from local
breeds. In developed countries the small farmers even can bred highly
productive rabbits, poultry etc.
·
The products
that are produced from local breeds are of better quality. We can take the
example of local ilberian pig that is involved in the better production of
cured ham as compared to the white pig that is not local. The animals that are
not much effective in the production of milk or meat are conserved or kept as
they are involved in the production of high quality products. There are some
products that don’t show much difference in case of intensive animals or local
breeds like cheese that in case of obtained from local breeds just show
apparent difference.


0 Comments